<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Hosting: Cheap Isn&#039;t Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-hosting/web-hosting-cheap-%e2%89%a0-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-hosting/web-hosting-cheap-%e2%89%a0-good/</link>
	<description>Malaysia website design blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Web Hosting and SEO Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-hosting/web-hosting-cheap-%e2%89%a0-good/comment-page-1/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Web Hosting and SEO Reports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hieveryone,IguessthiswillbemyveryfirstblogthatisrelatedtoWebHosting,whichIhopewillbeusefulasaguidetoreaderswhoarenewtowebhostingandwouldliketoshopfortheirfirstpaidwebhostingservice.Whenitcomestoshopp#comment-994</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top 10 Web Hosting and SEO Reports&lt;/strong&gt;

[Ã¢â‚¬Â¦] up and running 24Jan08 I had written sometime back about a free web hosting company called 000webhosting which claims to be free of charge until 2012. I was quite skeptical at that time since rarely any[Ã¢â‚¬Â¦]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top 10 Web Hosting and SEO Reports</strong></p>
<p>[Ã¢â‚¬Â¦] up and running 24Jan08 I had written sometime back about a free web hosting company called 000webhosting which claims to be free of charge until 2012. I was quite skeptical at that time since rarely any[Ã¢â‚¬Â¦]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KKHost</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-hosting/web-hosting-cheap-%e2%89%a0-good/comment-page-1/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>KKHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hieveryone,IguessthiswillbemyveryfirstblogthatisrelatedtoWebHosting,whichIhopewillbeusefulasaguidetoreaderswhoarenewtowebhostingandwouldliketoshopfortheirfirstpaidwebhostingservice.Whenitcomestoshopp#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Hi boringest,
First of all, not every web host oversells their services. It is very important for you to read the TOC &amp; AUP of the web host carefully when you&#039;re signing up for their services, especially when you believe that they are overselling their services.

Yes, such providers are just nice for personal web sites but when it comes to mission critical web sites, I seriously hope that one should expect to pay a little more. I still remember two years back when a hosting client wrote an article to The Star, blaming ALL the local web hosting providers simply because he said that ALL local hosting providers are not reliable. The main point is, he did not mention how much he paid for the hosting provider. He must have expected too much from the provider.

As to giga hosts&#039; reliability, only time can tell, seriously. If you&#039;re an active member in any web hosting forum, you&#039;ll realise that since the past few years, there are many oversellers who end up revising their packages back to something normal or they cease their operation when their servers are no longer able to sustain the growth of the web sites hosted.

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi boringest,<br />
First of all, not every web host oversells their services. It is very important for you to read the TOC &amp; AUP of the web host carefully when you&#8217;re signing up for their services, especially when you believe that they are overselling their services.</p>
<p>Yes, such providers are just nice for personal web sites but when it comes to mission critical web sites, I seriously hope that one should expect to pay a little more. I still remember two years back when a hosting client wrote an article to The Star, blaming ALL the local web hosting providers simply because he said that ALL local hosting providers are not reliable. The main point is, he did not mention how much he paid for the hosting provider. He must have expected too much from the provider.</p>
<p>As to giga hosts&#8217; reliability, only time can tell, seriously. If you&#8217;re an active member in any web hosting forum, you&#8217;ll realise that since the past few years, there are many oversellers who end up revising their packages back to something normal or they cease their operation when their servers are no longer able to sustain the growth of the web sites hosted.</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boringest</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-hosting/web-hosting-cheap-%e2%89%a0-good/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>boringest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hieveryone,IguessthiswillbemyveryfirstblogthatisrelatedtoWebHosting,whichIhopewillbeusefulasaguidetoreaderswhoarenewtowebhostingandwouldliketoshopfortheirfirstpaidwebhostingservice.Whenitcomestoshopp#comment-992</guid>
		<description>Seriously, everyone oversells unless you have a dedicated server to yourself but they do guarantee you the space you sign up for if you need it. The difference here is how they manage the server load.

Some cheap hosts out there are still pretty reliable, and if you&#039;re a blogger and just doing this for fun, do you think you would wanna pay for the extra reliability (0.1-0.2% extra) which you don&#039;t really need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, everyone oversells unless you have a dedicated server to yourself but they do guarantee you the space you sign up for if you need it. The difference here is how they manage the server load.</p>
<p>Some cheap hosts out there are still pretty reliable, and if you&#8217;re a blogger and just doing this for fun, do you think you would wanna pay for the extra reliability (0.1-0.2% extra) which you don&#8217;t really need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KKHost</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-hosting/web-hosting-cheap-%e2%89%a0-good/comment-page-1/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>KKHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hieveryone,IguessthiswillbemyveryfirstblogthatisrelatedtoWebHosting,whichIhopewillbeusefulasaguidetoreaderswhoarenewtowebhostingandwouldliketoshopfortheirfirstpaidwebhostingservice.Whenitcomestoshopp#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Dear Danny,
Yes, I have heard of MediaTemple before. Comparing their Shared Hosting and Virtual Dedicated packages, seems that they do oversell their shared hosting server:
Shared Hosting: 5GB storage for $14.95
Virtual Dedicated: 4GB for $49.95

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Danny,<br />
Yes, I have heard of MediaTemple before. Comparing their Shared Hosting and Virtual Dedicated packages, seems that they do oversell their shared hosting server:<br />
Shared Hosting: 5GB storage for $14.95<br />
Virtual Dedicated: 4GB for $49.95</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-hosting/web-hosting-cheap-%e2%89%a0-good/comment-page-1/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hieveryone,IguessthiswillbemyveryfirstblogthatisrelatedtoWebHosting,whichIhopewillbeusefulasaguidetoreaderswhoarenewtowebhostingandwouldliketoshopfortheirfirstpaidwebhostingservice.Whenitcomestoshopp#comment-990</guid>
		<description>Not sure if a lot of people have heard of Media Temaple but I know most designers should know about them. But the question would be, are they for real or are they good cause of extent of word-of-mouth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if a lot of people have heard of Media Temaple but I know most designers should know about them. But the question would be, are they for real or are they good cause of extent of word-of-mouth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/21 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 419/424 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dannyfoo.com @ 2012-02-12 03:49:45 -->
