<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forum Designs Simplified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-design/forum-designs-simplified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-design/forum-designs-simplified/</link>
	<description>Malaysia website design blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-design/forum-designs-simplified/comment-page-1/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a staff or mod I presume? :)

Anyway, not everyone likes change - like the new Facebook. But if it does improve the communal experience, then it&#039;s a good change in my book.

Nonetheless, probably in the future forum information is fully customizable. Things which we want to see and others which we feel we normally overlook.

For the LY forums, it&#039;ll be about studying the general repeat visitor experience and behavior to offer the best experience to them. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a staff or mod I presume? <img src='http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, not everyone likes change &#8211; like the new Facebook. But if it does improve the communal experience, then it&#8217;s a good change in my book.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, probably in the future forum information is fully customizable. Things which we want to see and others which we feel we normally overlook.</p>
<p>For the LY forums, it&#8217;ll be about studying the general repeat visitor experience and behavior to offer the best experience to them. <img src='http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WK</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/website-design/forum-designs-simplified/comment-page-1/#comment-3657</link>
		<dc:creator>WK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>Hey Danny, thanks for your feedback.

It used to be that we showed all the thousands of members that were online (as per the stock forum code), but that has since been cut down to the first 20 when I realized it was doubling the HTML size.

That said, I wouldn&#039;t agree that it&#039;s totally worthless - I recall a number of occassions where the moderators have been contacted for urgent action due to their name appearing in the online list. Other than that, it&#039;s mostly a general curiosity feature that has been in since day 1.

I&#039;ve tried to reduce clutter in the Kopitiam forum once by reducing avatar size, removing signatures, and removing profile info. The result looks like:

Original: http://home.doubleukay.com/lowyat/kopitiam-fullscale.png
Slim: http://home.doubleukay.com/lowyat/kopitiam-slimscale.png

Much easier to glide past the posts. Well, it turns out that the cleaner look was voted out 3 to 1 :) Our forumers are comfortable looking at the clutter.. I guess.

And just to add some variety to the discussion, we can have extremely cluttered designs that are unclean (discuz.net), but also simple designs that are unclean (4chan.org).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Danny, thanks for your feedback.</p>
<p>It used to be that we showed all the thousands of members that were online (as per the stock forum code), but that has since been cut down to the first 20 when I realized it was doubling the HTML size.</p>
<p>That said, I wouldn&#8217;t agree that it&#8217;s totally worthless &#8211; I recall a number of occassions where the moderators have been contacted for urgent action due to their name appearing in the online list. Other than that, it&#8217;s mostly a general curiosity feature that has been in since day 1.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried to reduce clutter in the Kopitiam forum once by reducing avatar size, removing signatures, and removing profile info. The result looks like:</p>
<p>Original: <a href="http://home.doubleukay.com/lowyat/kopitiam-fullscale.png" rel="nofollow">http://home.doubleukay.com/lowyat/kopitiam-fullscale.png</a><br />
Slim: <a href="http://home.doubleukay.com/lowyat/kopitiam-slimscale.png" rel="nofollow">http://home.doubleukay.com/lowyat/kopitiam-slimscale.png</a></p>
<p>Much easier to glide past the posts. Well, it turns out that the cleaner look was voted out 3 to 1 <img src='http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Our forumers are comfortable looking at the clutter.. I guess.</p>
<p>And just to add some variety to the discussion, we can have extremely cluttered designs that are unclean (discuz.net), but also simple designs that are unclean (4chan.org).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 8/17 queries in 0.023 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 383/386 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dannyfoo.com @ 2012-02-12 02:00:04 -->
