<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Than Simple Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/news/more-than-simple-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/news/more-than-simple-blogs/</link>
	<description>Malaysia website design blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur_Avalon</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/news/more-than-simple-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur_Avalon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 08:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>Blogging has gone out of control. Much of the blog contents are sheer chat. They might as well do a session of chat rather than blog.
Since many bloggers operate as interconnected rings and mini-networks, they would fare better with a gmail group or yahoo group.
If the number of participants is small, they can just operate with their address books.

Maybe there is need for some sort of body which passes constructive comments in the comments section of the blogs.

If there is no steering and no quality control, then blogging would be great time-waster. Bloggers would have stoop low to make their blogs visitable and readable.

Think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging has gone out of control. Much of the blog contents are sheer chat. They might as well do a session of chat rather than blog.<br />
Since many bloggers operate as interconnected rings and mini-networks, they would fare better with a gmail group or yahoo group.<br />
If the number of participants is small, they can just operate with their address books.</p>
<p>Maybe there is need for some sort of body which passes constructive comments in the comments section of the blogs.</p>
<p>If there is no steering and no quality control, then blogging would be great time-waster. Bloggers would have stoop low to make their blogs visitable and readable.</p>
<p>Think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/news/more-than-simple-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>&quot;..blog for what is right from their heart and not just from what comes out of their minds.&quot;

Allow me to explain what I meant by this. It means that older bloggers should be encouraging bloggers to blog from their hearts and not just with their minds thinking of the fame and glory. The sentence wasn&#039;t intended to urge bloggers to take on a mentor. My apologies if you took it that way.

The reason for mentors are like your parents or seniors who&#039;ll be around to guide you in any problems you might be facing. For instance, if someone started flaming your blog for no apparent reason, do you just flame back? or find the person out and wallop them? or leave them be? or any other method to solve the solution?

Goes the same for finding your blogging style. Mentors may be able to shed some light and give you feedback. But in the end it&#039;s your choice.

Mentors aren&#039;t around to give you lectures but to advice you on the best possible solution. That means that you either choose to listen or not.

@Itchy
Thanks, URL ammended. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;..blog for what is right from their heart and not just from what comes out of their minds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Allow me to explain what I meant by this. It means that older bloggers should be encouraging bloggers to blog from their hearts and not just with their minds thinking of the fame and glory. The sentence wasn&#8217;t intended to urge bloggers to take on a mentor. My apologies if you took it that way.</p>
<p>The reason for mentors are like your parents or seniors who&#8217;ll be around to guide you in any problems you might be facing. For instance, if someone started flaming your blog for no apparent reason, do you just flame back? or find the person out and wallop them? or leave them be? or any other method to solve the solution?</p>
<p>Goes the same for finding your blogging style. Mentors may be able to shed some light and give you feedback. But in the end it&#8217;s your choice.</p>
<p>Mentors aren&#8217;t around to give you lectures but to advice you on the best possible solution. That means that you either choose to listen or not.</p>
<p>@Itchy<br />
Thanks, URL ammended. <img src='http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ItchyMicchi</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/news/more-than-simple-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>ItchyMicchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>hi, just wanted to tell you there&#039;s an extra &quot;e&quot; in the screenshots url. and also, it&#039;s the same people pinging PPS most of the time, so there isn&#039;t much range anyway.

(i&#039;ve forgotten my password, so no go for me!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, just wanted to tell you there&#8217;s an extra &#8220;e&#8221; in the screenshots url. and also, it&#8217;s the same people pinging PPS most of the time, so there isn&#8217;t much range anyway.</p>
<p>(i&#8217;ve forgotten my password, so no go for me!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ariel</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/news/more-than-simple-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>Blogosphere needs diversity, not more &#039;MacZuls and Jeff Oois&#039;, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogosphere needs diversity, not more &#8216;MacZuls and Jeff Oois&#8217;, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wingz</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyfoo.com/blog/news/more-than-simple-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Wingz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>i do agree with totoro, why must have guru ? Why must follow the Guru style ? why cant we use our own style ?

No pun intended but if you take a look at pps nowadays. Its fulla so call tech blog ... why is this ?  i think i no need to elaborate on this issue also we all know why la. A handfull of them are really good but the rest are merely a replica of &quot;someone&quot;

i think this is what you get for learning from &quot;guru&quot; huh?

&quot;Guru?&quot; lancau la! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do agree with totoro, why must have guru ? Why must follow the Guru style ? why cant we use our own style ?</p>
<p>No pun intended but if you take a look at pps nowadays. Its fulla so call tech blog &#8230; why is this ?  i think i no need to elaborate on this issue also we all know why la. A handfull of them are really good but the rest are merely a replica of &#8220;someone&#8221;</p>
<p>i think this is what you get for learning from &#8220;guru&#8221; huh?</p>
<p>&#8220;Guru?&#8221; lancau la! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/21 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 422/428 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dannyfoo.com @ 2012-02-11 23:00:56 -->
